Determination of the feasibility of a climate project for the transfer of port tugboats to a fully electric power plant equipped with accumulators of electric power
EDN: EDXJCU
Abstract
A study of the foreign regulatory framework has shown that a reliable way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero by tugboats is to use vessels with a fully electric power plant consisting of rechargeable batteries. For this reason, the purpose of the study is to determine the feasibility of creating a climate project for the transfer of port tugboats to a fully electric power plant consisting of rechargeable batteries; the possibility of registering planned actions as a climate project; the economic feasibility of such a project in Russia and in the EU.
The article evaluates the applicability of this project and shows the conditions under which it becomes possible to obtain a positive effect, when the costs of implementing measures can be partially offset by the implementation of carbon units. The article shows that from a technical point of view, the climatic project of transferring a tugboat to a battery power plant is feasible, since at the moment the components themselves for conversion (batteries with the necessary characteristics, emergency diesel generators, etc.) are freely available, as well as similar samples of marine equipment. An important aspect and the main disadvantage of the climate project under study in our country is that for its registration it is necessary to prove that the actions taken will reduce the company's carbon footprint by the required amount (i.e. by 50,000 tons of CO2-eq/year), which can potentially be performed by a towing company spending about 16 thousand tons of petroleum fuel per year and/or owning a fleet of tugboats with a total capacity of 38 MW.
The results of calculations of the economic feasibility of the studied climate project in relation to the EU and the Russian Federation demonstrate that despite the favorable "climate" for the creation and implementation of climate projects in the EU, the significant price of electricity almost completely negates the benefits of not having to pay significant taxes on sulfur emissions and sales of relatively expensive carbon units. In relation to the EU, the expected reduction in operating costs is an insignificant amount, comparable to the error of the calculation itself, in other cases, the calculation showed a significant increase in the cost of operating costs (up to 46 %). Despite the relatively low cost of a carbon unit in the Russian Federation, in some cases the reduction in operating costs exceeded 20 %, which may be explained by the low price of electricity.
About the Author
A. S. ReutskiiRussian Federation
PhD
191186 St. Petersburg, Millionnaya ul., 7A
References
1. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 455 of March 24, 2022 ‘On Approval of the Rules for Verification of the Results of Climate Project Implementation’. (In Russ.)
2. Reutskii A.S., Semionichev D.S., Mikheeva A.A. Identification of the main ways to implement climate projects in waterborne transport. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2024. No. 75. P. 4–15. EDN FJOQTC. (In Russ.)
3. Pinaev V.E., Ukhova V.N., Ledashcheva T.N. Napravleniya, opyt i perspektivy realizatsii klimaticheskikh proektov v Rossii [Directions, experience and prospects for the implementation of carbon projects in Russia]. Russian Journal of Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2023. Т. 10. No. 2. URL: https://resources.today/en/17ecor223.html (accessed 10.09.2024). DOI 10.15862/17ECOR223.
4. Reutskii A.S., Shurpyak V.K., Tolmachev S.A. Analysis of the IMO guidelines for estimating the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions over the life cycle for all types of marine fuels. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2025. No. 79. P. 14–25. EDN FBBBJV. (In Russ.)
5. Tolmachev S.A., Serov A.A., Mikheeva A.A., Semionichev D.S., Reutskii A.S. Consequences of applying MARPOL requirements to operational carbon intensity (CII), and approaches for their improvement. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2024. No. 77. P. 24–32. EDN FXBYEL. (In Russ.)
6. Reutskii A.S., Yakimov V.V., Butsanets A.A. Assessment of the impact of the type of marine fuel used on the carbon footprint of the transport service. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2024. No. 76. P. 87–95. EDN ICJSDQ. (In Russ.)
7. Fuentes García G., Echeverría R.S., Reynoso A.G., Baldasano Recio J.M. et al. Sea port SO2 atmospheric emissions influence on air quality and exposure at Veracruz, Mexico. Atmosphere. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 1950. DOI 10.3390/atmos13121950.
8. Fuentes García G., Sosa Echeverría R., Baldasano Recio J.M., Kahl J.D. et al. Atmospheric emissions in ports due to maritime traffic in Mexico. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 9. P. 1186. DOI 10.3390/jmse9111186.
9. Mikhaylov A.S., Plotnikova A.P. The coasts we live in: can there be a single definition for a coastal zone? Baltic Region. 2021. Vol. 13, No. 4. P. 36–53. DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2021-4-3. (In Russ.)
10. Pavlovskii V.A., Reutskii A.S. Teplofizicheskie osnovy morskoi transportirovki i bunkerovki szhizhennogo prirodnogo gaza [Thermophysical principles of maritime transportation and bunkering of liquefied natural gas]. St. Petersburg: FGUP KGNTs, 2019. 88 p. EDN EZHRNH.
11. Buyanov A.S., Leonova O.N., Reutsky A.S. Methanol and ethanol as ship fuel: analysis of application experience. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2021. No. 64–65. P. 91–97. EDN MIMXNW. (In Russ.)
12. Kondratenko A.A., Reutsky A.S. Design specifics of LNG bunkering ships. Transactions of the Krylov State Research Centre. 2019. Special Edition 1. Р. 216–222. DOI 10.24937/2542-2324-2019-1-S-I-216-222. EDN EHJHYJ. (In Russ.)
13. CMA CGM and SIPG ink long-term onshore power cooperation. Seatrade Maritime. URL: https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/sustainability/cma-cgm-and-sipg-ink-long-term-onshore-power-cooperation (accessed 25.12.2025).
14. Borgøy: the world’s first LNG-fueled tug. MarineLink. URL: https://www.marinelink.com/news/lngfueled-worlds-first364856.aspx# (accessed 25.12.2025).
15. Reutskii A.S. Osobennosti proektirovaniya sudov-bunkerovshchikov szhizhennym prirodnym gazom [Design peculiarities of LNG bunkering ships: PhD thesis] / St. Petersburg State Marine Technical University. 2021. 346 р. EDN CCFESV.
16. First methanol-fueled tug launches at port of Antwerp. The Maritime Executive. URL: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/firstmethanol-fueled-tug-launches-at-port-of-antwerp (accessed 25.12.2025).
17. NYK completes world’s first commercial-use ammonia-fueled vessel. The Maritime Executive. URL: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/nyk-completes-world-s-first-commercial-use-ammonia-fueled-vessel (accessed 25.12.2025).
18. Guinness world record for power set by Damen-built electric tug in UAE. The Maritime Executive. URL: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/guinness-world-record-for-power-set-by-damen-built-electric-tug-in-uae (accessed 25.12.2025).
19. The role of LNG in emission reduction: Exploring the potential and limitations of LNG as a transition fuel for the shipping industry. Diverse Daily. URL: https://diversedaily.com/the-role-of-lng-in-emission-reduction-exploring-the-potential-and-limitations-of-lng-as-a-transitionfuel-for-the-shipping-industry/ (accessed 25.12.2025).
20. Ivanov G. Efficient application range of electric cargo ships. International Journal of Maritime Engineering. 2023. Vol. 165, No. A1. P. 1–10.
21. Reutskii A.S., Semionichev D.S., Mikheeva A.A. Determining reasonability criteria for climate projects in water transport. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2025. No. 78. P. 16–22. EDN ZURMGR. (In Russ.)
22. Federal Law No 296 On Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of July 2, 2021.
23. Minhazul Islam, Saad Alif-A. Zaman, Md Mashiur Rahaman. Concept of an electric-powered passenger vessel in Bangladesh. Journal of Maritime Research. 2023. Vol. 20, No. 3. P. 68–71.
24. Koričan M., Frković L., Vladimir N. Electrification of fishing vessels and their integration into isolated energy systems with a high share of renewables. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023. Vol. 425. P. 138997
25. Percić M., Koričan M., Jovanović I., Vladimir N. Environmental and economic assessment of batteries for marine applications: Case study of all-electric fishing vessels. Batteries. 2024. Vol. 10, Issue 7. DOI 10.3390/batteries10010007.
26. A "green fleet" for Lake Baikal: The keel of the Baikal project's electric cruise ship is laid. Vodokhod. URL: https://vodohod.com/about/news/zelenyy-flot-dlya-baykala-zalozhen-kil-kruiznogo-elektrosudna-proekta-baykal/ (accessed 25.12.2025).
27. Koumentakos A.G. Developments in electric and green marine ships. Applied System Innovation. 2019. Vol. 2, No. 4. P. 34.
28. Roy R.B., Alahakoon S., Janse Van Rensburg P., Basher E. et al. Impact analysis on distribution network due to coordinated electric ferry charging. IET Energy Systems Integration. 2024. Vol. 6, No. 4. P. 638–663.
29. Vasiliev A.A., Ovchinnikov K.D. Analysis of design characteristics of ice-class supply vessels with alternative energy sources. Marine Intellectual Technologies. 2024. No. 1, part 1. P. 11–19. (In Russ.)
30. RSD Tug 2513 Electric. Damen Shipyards Group. URL: https://www.damen.com/vessels/tugs/electric-tugs/rsd-tug-2513-electric#specifications (accessed 25.12.2025).
31. Nakopiteli energii NE-650-160 [Energy storage devices NE-650-160]. ECS SKO. URL: https://ecs-sko.ru/catalog/equipment/detail/nakopitelienergii-ne-650-160/ (accessed 25.12.2025).
32. [Goszakupki: Kharakteristiki buksira moshchnost'yu ~2800 kVt] [Public procurement: Characteristics of a ~2800 kW tugboat]. EIS Zakupki [Unified information system for procurement]. URL: https://zakupki.gov.ru/epz/order/notice/ok504/view/documents.html?regNumber=0172200002519000078 (accessed 25.12.2025).
33. Resolution MEPC.376(80) (adopted on 7 July 2023): Guidelines on life cycle GHG intensity of marine fuels (LCA guidelines).
34. ISO 8217:2024 Products from petroleum, synthetic and renewable sources — Fuels (class F) — Specifications of marine fuels.
35. Nikolaev N.I., Gerasidi V.V., Lisachenko A.V. Modern high-speed engines CAT 3500 series of marine tugs analysis of loads experimental data. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota im. admirala S.O. Makarova. 2014. No. 6(28). P. 49–55.
36. SP 350.1326000.2018 Normy tekhnologicheskogo proektirovaniya morskikh portov [Code 350.1326000.2018 Norms for technological design of sea ports]. Moscow: Standartinform, 2018. (In Russ.)
37. Bossche M. van den, Janse R., Jong O. de, Mehmood U. Economic impact of the European towage sector. Rotterdam, 29 October 2019.
38. Rotterdam bunker fuel price. OilMonster. URL: https://www.oilmonster.com/bunker-fuel-prices/west-northern-europe/rotterdam/133 (accessed 25.12.2025).
39. Rotterdam bunker prices. Ship & Bunker. URL: https://www.shipandbunker.com/prices/emea/nwe/nl-rtm-rotterdam (accessed 25.12.2025).
40. Stoimost' bunkernogo topliva po itogam noyabrya 2023 goda [Bunker fuel prices as of November 2023]. FSA. URL: https://fsarf.ru/analytics/stoimost-bunkernogo-topliva-po-itogam-noyabrya-2023-goda/ (accessed 25.12.2025).
41. Wang H., Aung M.Z., Xu X., Boulougouris E. Life cycle analysis of hydrogen powered marine vessels — Case ship comparison study with conventional power system. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 17. P. 12946. DOI 10.3390/su151712946.
42. Spisok stran Evropy po stoimosti elektroenergii [List of European countries by electricity cost]. Wikipedia. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Список_стран_Европы_по_стоимости_электроэнергии/ (accessed 25.12.2025).
43. Tsena na elektroenergiyu dlya biznesa po sub"ektam RF [Electricity prices for businesses by region of the Russian Federation]. AO Gazprom Energosbyt. URL: https://energosbyt.gazprom.ru/ (accessed 06.04.2026).
Review
For citations:
Reutskii A.S. Determination of the feasibility of a climate project for the transfer of port tugboats to a fully electric power plant equipped with accumulators of electric power. Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping. 2026;56(1):77-90. (In Russ.) EDN: EDXJCU
JATS XML

